Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180221
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 138 2-Core 271 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 761 75% 616 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6583) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 153 Parallax 140 110% 143 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 130 Splatting 104 94% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 454GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 660 559 684 664 659 661 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,137 Write 975 Mixed 834 SusWrite 648 201% 899 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 69.1 238% 86.9 MB/s	DQ Read 689 DQ Write 835 DQ Mixed 270 340% 598 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 295%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 341GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 244 268 276 268 270 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 402 Mixed 372 SusWrite 265 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 48.6 170% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 305 243% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
External USB3.0 1TB 343 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 320GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.9% Very poor	Read 39 Write 40.8 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 14.7 8% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 11.3 38% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 17.1 DQ Mixed 15.3 12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 498GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 147 142 145 158 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 176 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 150 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35,039 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 173 173 170 172 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 133 Mixed 79 SusWrite 171 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 38.2 Write 38.5 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 14.1 40% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 61%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 345GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 37.7 Write 38 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 14.1 43% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 14.4 1,182% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 21.4 DQ Mixed 16.6 1,343% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB-$65 2,716 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.2 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 23.4 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $62Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	395x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	387x
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	356x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	403x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	350x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	218x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	117x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	70x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	61x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16