Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 05 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,268
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 1,282
79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 118
Parallax 111
97% 116 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 84.9
86% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 970 835 835 567 396 393 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,022
Write 1,609
Mixed 1,478
SusWrite 666
322% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 72.8
251% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,038
866% 1,264 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 260%
Great: 297%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
142GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 302 318 318 317 315 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 468
Mixed 385
SusWrite 308
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 60.9
205% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
87GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 477
Write 131
Mixed 132
SusWrite 130
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 18.7
112% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 48.9
83% 169 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 73%
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
103GB free
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 163 163 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 490
Mixed 400
SusWrite 178
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 59.9
204% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 110%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 33.4
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $695
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback