Asus M2N68-AM Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M2N68-AM Plus  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '16 at 23:51
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 82.5
43% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 82.3
11% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 81.9
5% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A48 480GB
189GB free
Firmware: 608A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 219
Write 160
Mixed 190
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.5
42% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 22.1
DQ Mixed 12.8
13% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 49%
Nvidia STRIPE 111.79G 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 307
Write 147
Mixed 206
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 10.8
43% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 17.8
31% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68-AM Plus Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68-AM Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback