TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro X9DRFR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DRFR  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRFR
Memory28.5 GB free of 32.0156 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 12:03
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 149
60% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 446
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SMC SMC2208 899GB
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 219 212 220 218 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
126% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 210
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 217
132% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
362% 2.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70QH0- Micron/Numonyx 25Q Series 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 27.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback