Lenovo 90G9009GFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90G9009GFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36F7
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '19 at 21:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 99.1
49% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 72.6
8-Core 78
10% 75.3 Pts
64-Core 85.6
5% 85.6 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 364F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.50.26.04
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.66
4% 5.44 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.35
3% 4.08 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 152 155 157 160 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 434
Write 422
Mixed 374
SusWrite 160
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 39.8
121% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 157
118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
930GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 157 173 179 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 189
Mixed 78
SusWrite 166
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
1GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.6
Write 49.2
Mixed 58.2
69% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.6
150% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
USB MEMORY BAR 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.87% Terrible
Read 9
Write 3.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 4.7
6% 5.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback