Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Extreme7+  (all builds)
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 17:11
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 658
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.51
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 110
Parallax 104
81% 105 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 95.7
78% 95 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,531
Write 1,401
Mixed 578
259% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 69.7
264% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,249
DQ Write 1,259
DQ Mixed 692
675% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
74GB free
Firmware: 5.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 130 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 406
Write 155
Mixed 190
SusWrite 136
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 40.5
164% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 123
104% 152 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 83%
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1122 128GB
68GB free
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 174 178 178 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 475
Write 172
Mixed 164
SusWrite 176
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 12.9
118% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 80
93% 161 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 70%
Marvell Raid VD 1 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 178 187 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 183
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 184
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB
437GB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 169 176 175 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 169
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 173
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 157%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB
3TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 182 186 186 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 196
Write 186
Mixed 104
SusWrite 185
223% 168 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
249% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 27.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Extreme7+ Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Extreme7+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback