Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V5.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V5.3
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 15:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 653
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 41.5
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 38.2
34% 40.8 fps
MRender 43.8
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 37.6
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 441 457 471 470 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 462
Mixed 341
SusWrite 463
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 54.8
196% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 325
248% 337 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HKF05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 111 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 108
Write 92.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 110
62% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 21.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V5.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback