Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 201 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 383 50% 376 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2002) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.44 2% 1.66 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.79 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 404 393 354 341 327 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 458 Mixed 362 SusWrite 379 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 43.9 141% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 364 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5173QH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 18 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16