MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121113
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 07:37
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 236
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 593
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 79.3
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 78.4
65% 79.4 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 75.7
60% 73.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 370 370 383 351 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 387
Mixed 325
SusWrite 366
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 35
122% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 258
219% 318 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 129%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
13GB free
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 370
Write 385
Mixed 278
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 33.7
119% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 323
247% 334 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
74GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 16 8.1 6.6 5.7 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 17.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
6GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 96.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 94.9
55% 76 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
158GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 112
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 96.3
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 108%
SP SDXC USB 3.0 64GB
40GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 79.5
Write 68
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 69.6
91% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 4.8
354% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 MPower (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77 MPower (MS-7751) - $444

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback