PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus B85M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131028 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 29 '19 at 22:57 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
|
32.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 315 314 315 316 317 MB/s
|
136%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 1TB
788GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 489 483 482 495 494 MB/s
|
141%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
676GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 23 24 24 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 397x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 323x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 259x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 327x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 201x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 175x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $343 |