| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK FX505DT |
| Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190822 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 29 '19 at 13:29 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
39.8%
Below average
|
41% 72.9 Pts
|
37% 301 Pts
|
23% 372 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.1%
Very poor
|
8% 20.8 fps
|
34% 41.5 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
27.9%
Poor
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
19% 214 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,832 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples | 1,369x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 951x |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples | 511x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |