Asrock Z77 Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 01:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 196
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 331
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 77.7
52% 68.8 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 53.4
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 95 86 98 108 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 68.5
Write 110
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 96.3
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 Micron 8JTF12864AZ-1G4F1 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Micron 8JTF12864AZ-1G4F1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 13.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme3 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $481
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback