| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 700-040ez (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 |
| Memory | 7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 27 '19 at 19:24 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73%
Very good
|
74% 127 Pts
|
54% 439 Pts
|
36% 581 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Device(1B0A 90C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.7
|
5.5%
Terrible
|
5% 5.94 fps
|
6% 7.61 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 219 235 240 231 250 MB/s
|
32.2%
Below average
|
30% 133 MB/s
|
43% 14.1 MB/s
|
12% 16.3 MB/s
|
|
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 MB/s
|
3.11%
Terrible
|
5% 4.65 MB/s
|
13% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
42.4%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
54% 74.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 700-040ez Builds (Compare 4 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 700-040ez
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 108% - Outstanding | Total price: $134 |