HP COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150324
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '19 at 01:14
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235 3,026 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 152 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 368 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 37.2 32% 35.6 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 35.6 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB 21,221 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 233 291 437 421 176 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 438 Write 435 Mixed 339 SusWrite 327 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 39.2 130% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 248 215% 319 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 117%
WD My Book 1230 6TB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 428GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 91 91 92 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 86.3 Write 90.3 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 91.6 106% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP COMPAQ 8200 SFF USAO

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	5x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GBBench 78%, 11,560 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x

RAM
HP655409-150-HYCG Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 4GBKingstonBench 48%, 3 samples	2x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBCorsairBench 29%, 4,128 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16