Asus G75VW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 17 '15 at 01:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 178
61% 135 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 506
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 42% Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Asus(1043 2115) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 3.91
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 3.57
Splatting 4.87
3% 4.02 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 97.9
Mixed 51.2
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.17
64% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%
Apricorn SATAWire 750GB
617GB free, PID 0040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 25.3
Write 39.2
Mixed 19.2
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 5.69
4K Mixed 0.51
214% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback