Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Satellite C640 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '19 at 19:13
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 60.1 2-Core 109 47% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 147 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDF2) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 77 73 75 76 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 231 Write 62.7 Mixed 106 SusWrite 74.2 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 20.6 59% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 114 83% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS1-DJ-F 4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.6% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	42x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	22x
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	18x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 23%, 2,805 samples	12x
TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 1x2GBUnknownBench 19%, 105 samples	6x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 692 samples	5x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158