Asus N71Jq

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus N71Jq  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N71Jq
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 61.3
40% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 150
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5000 (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 5.06
5% 6.04 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 4.37
Splatting 7
5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 77 34 28 22 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 135
SusWrite 64.8
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 24.4
72% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 160
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
218GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 56 59 70 69 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 51.8
Write 63
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 65.1
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N71Jq Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N71Jq

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback