Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive	17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M 430 164 User benchmarks, average bench 25% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 3 2-Core 3.1 2% 3.05 Pts	4-Core 2.6 8-Core 2.4 0% 2.5 Pts	64-Core 2.7 0% 2.7 Pts
Poor: 15% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 75 77 73 75 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.4% Very poor	Read 80.8 Write 93.8 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 74.4 19% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 8.9 29% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 10.9 DQ Write 9.3 DQ Mixed 10.5 8% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 124%
USB DISK 3.0 126GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 87GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 23 Write 19 Mixed 20 SusWrite 17.4 26% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1 70% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	MC Read 0.4 MC Write 0.3 MC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.37 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 785 5% 785 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM