ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 09932SU

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 09932SU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Emerald Lake
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111205
Uptime	11.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '19 at 22:43
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 137 60% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 180 23% 175 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3976) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.19% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 2.38 2% 2.72 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.19% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
THNSF8120CCSE 120GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: DAC9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 162 163 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 376 Write 163 Mixed 216 SusWrite 162 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 24.4 83% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 185 148% 210 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 88%
Ct2000mx 50 2TB 761 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 34 34 34 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.8% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 32 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 34.4 8% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 10.7 36% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 23 DQ Mixed 23.3 18% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.9% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 12.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback