Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 116 48% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 155 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 55 66 74 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 61 Write 65 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 66.2 44% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT1GC64BH4B0PS-CG 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 3GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1067, 1067 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	196x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	23x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	10x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158