Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory235 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 18:07
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 140
54% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 555
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,866
116% 1,866 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 60.2
50% 64.1 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 69.5
51% 62 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 659 663 657 654 650 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,629
Write 1,549
Mixed 1,224
SusWrite 684
285% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 60.5
195% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 557
386% 477 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 187%
Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
820GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 408 408 410 410 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 423
Mixed 392
SusWrite 403
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 39.9
130% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 303
230% 307 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97%
Great: 125%
WD Elements SE 25FF 3TB
920GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 99.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 101
128% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.7
254% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 63%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 197GB
139GB free, PID 0326
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 44 42 42 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 42.8
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 44.2
67% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.4
282% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BM2-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback