Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 09:18
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 883
88% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 36.4
29% 32.7 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 32.9
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$194
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1169 1098 1121 492 289 295 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 886
Write 928
Mixed 756
SusWrite 744
187% 828 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 58.1
204% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 507
459% 699 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 179%
Great: 211%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
232GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 454 410 292 292 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 462
Mixed 430
SusWrite 365
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 67.6
231% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 130%
Great: 128%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
678GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 171 172 172 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 121
Write 135
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 171
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 160b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Read 1
Write 2.2
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 3.1
3% 1.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 26
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 30.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $646
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback