ECS H81M-C2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS H81M-C2H  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 16:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 159
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 295
44% 323 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 96.9
Parallax 203
94% 138 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 108
Splatting 133
94% 112 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 85 98 45 62 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64% Good
Read 148
Write 161
Mixed 136
SusWrite 74.9
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R538G1601U2S 1201 R538G1601U2S-UGO 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C2H Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81M-C2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback