Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 15:43
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,123
102% 859 Pts
64-Core 1123
70% 1123 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 168
Parallax 180
147% 176 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 154
Splatting 113
120% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
501GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 494 510 509 511 511 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
389GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1293 1379 478 488 526 523 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,501
Write 2,156
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 781
390% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 85.9
311% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 1,437
DQ Mixed 1485
1,097% 1,437 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 306%
Great: 393%
Samsung 830 Series 500GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 20 51 50 49 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 5,211
Write 56.2
Mixed 112
SusWrite 36.7
282% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 781
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 7
1,194% 264 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 127 128 127 129 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 194
Write 145
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 129
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
5% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
WD WD5000AADS-56S9B1 1TB
493GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 102 104 104 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 117
Write 97.5
Mixed 101
SusWrite 103
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 137 139 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 160
Write 130
Mixed 116
SusWrite 137
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 85%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
466GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 42
Mixed 31
SusWrite 41.9
53% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDP725032GLA360 320GB
298GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
Read 41.1
Write 41
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.7
51% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 16%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
29GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 10.8
Mixed 15
SusWrite 37.7
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 41%
WDC WD50 00AADS-00S9B0 500GB
306GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.1 5 4.9 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 38
Write 27
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 4.9
31% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 27%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
552GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 42.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 0.1
38% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD 64GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 68.1
MC Mixed 41
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 122%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback