| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190610 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 21 '19 at 03:01 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
45.4%
Average
|
44% 83.8 Pts
|
42% 340 Pts
|
32% 525 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.1
|
50.7%
Above average
|
52% 68.1 fps
|
48% 60 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 58 42 55 50 65 MB/s
|
33.8%
Below average
|
44% 59.2 MB/s
|
177% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
21% 7.2 GB/s
|
13% 4.57 GB/s
|
20% 206 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 725x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 285x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 271x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 621x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |