Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 12:51
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 289
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 902
90% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 114
Parallax 258
114% 170 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 134
Splatting 156
113% 135 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTLAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 92 87 100 116 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 458
Write 102
Mixed 189
SusWrite 105
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 27
91% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 167
120% 158 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60%
Great: 106%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
21GB free
Firmware: JE4OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 41 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 42.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 43.8
26% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 53%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 30.3
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 27.8
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.7
242% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 22%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 2TB
319GB free, PID 0251
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 69.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 68.6
77% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
7GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 57 57 56 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 99.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 72.7
108% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
727GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 66 62 64 67 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
Read 100
Write 75.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 67.2
94% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 43%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
253GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 116
148% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50%
Great: 51%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
155GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 66 62 63 69 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 202
Write 135
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 68.6
150% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback