MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A71
MotherboardMSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71)  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 10:29
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 229
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 458
56% 430 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 110
90% 112 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$71
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1106C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 570 553 543 505 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 2,099
Write 1,465
Mixed 671
SusWrite 501
262% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 58.7
208% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 603
386% 423 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 194%
Great: 339%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
85GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 228 231 231 233 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 422
Mixed 338
SusWrite 250
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57
194% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 339
258% 348 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
10GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 59.7
Mixed 36
36% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 178 178 180 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 144
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 179
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 114%
Barracuda XT 4TB
183GB free
Firmware: CC42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 168 168 169 169 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 162
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 166
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
449% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HCC545050B9A300 500GB
380GB free
Firmware: PB4VCC0D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 65 63 66 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 78.5
Write 59
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 63.3
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 46%
Seagate USB 2TB
414GB free, PID a0a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 92 89 95 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 37.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 91.1
84% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 859B BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 20GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.7% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) Builds (Compare 6,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback