Asus Z87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 129
2-Core 239
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 646
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 106
Parallax 106
92% 108 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 101
Splatting 85.1
85% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Origin Inception SSD 128GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0529A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 158 161 148 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 328
Write 158
Mixed 156
SusWrite 149
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 11.7
82% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 52.6
69% 125 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 62%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
39GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 160 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 350
Write 345
Mixed 269
SusWrite 152
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 42.4
145% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 149
135% 205 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
109GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 84 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 72
SusWrite 85.5
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
10GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 43 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 44.4
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 41%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
36GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 96 100 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 132
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 98.7
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 1314 991995 (996995) 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PLUS - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback