Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180105
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '19 at 20:59
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 215 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 731 69% 571 Pts	64-Core 1,173 73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E376) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Lighting 97.2 Reflection 86.9 Parallax 147 79% 110 fps	MRender 88 Gravity 110 Splatting 122 89% 106 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 222 233 229 124 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 396 Write 384 Mixed 315 SusWrite 211 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 34.4 140% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 197 168% 243 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 34GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 96 95 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 105 Write 103 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 95.6 62% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 32.2 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 40.6 SC Mixed 27.1 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	66x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	44x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	33x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	32x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GBBench 96%, 6,836 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $59Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $511

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16