Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180105
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 20:49
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 722
67% 561 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 910 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.7% Good
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 88
Parallax 97.6
54% 83.8 fps
MRender 85.7
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 119
78% 91.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 82 76 75 64 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.1% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 275
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 81.1
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 14.8
31% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 43.1
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 143
84% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
233GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 120 121 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 158
Write 184
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 120
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 33.1
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 3-CF - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback