Sgi.com Thurley

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSgi.com Thurley  (all builds)
MotherboardSGI.COM Rack-TY2
Memory21 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 17:43
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5530
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 122
59% 93 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 292
27% 225 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJK3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 90 114 112 114 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 49
SusWrite 103
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 74%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
146GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 60 60 62 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 57.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 59.1
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF51272PZ-1G4F1 36JSF51272PZ-1G4F1 36JSF51272PZ-1G4F1 36JSF51272PZ-1G4F1 36JSF51272PZ-1G4F1 36JSF51272PZ-1G4F1 ST M25PE16/TSI 58GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 15
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Thurley Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Sgi.com Thurley

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback