HP Spectre x360 Convertible

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Spectre x360 Convertible  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8174
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '16 at 19:24
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 168
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 221
33% 242 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8174) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4377
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 8
Parallax 5.84
5% 6.69 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.7
7% 8.24 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-256V2G-HP 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2803 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 496
Write 278
Mixed 355
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 32
122% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 67.1
96% 179 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 93%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
2TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 88.8
Write 84.1
Mixed 29.6
80% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 0.82
4K Mixed 0.07
34% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDFB232A1MA-JD-F 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Spectre x360 Convertible Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Spectre x360 Convertible

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback