Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 10:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 140
59% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 419
41% 335 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 112
Parallax 97.5
82% 103 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 96.8
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 117 81 165 162 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 367
Write 328
Mixed 274
SusWrite 148
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 26
87% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 173
154% 233 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 95%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
251GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 85 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 99
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 84.7
69% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 500GB
204GB free, PID ab05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 31 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 32
Write 30
Mixed 23
SusWrite 31.4
39% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $609
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback