Acer NC-R7-371T-52JR

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer NC-R7-371T-52JR (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer SKI
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150714
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 15:23
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	61%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 119 54% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 204 25% 192 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 0915) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 6.38 4% 6.2 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 10.9 6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD 256GB 755 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 269 268 285 287 274 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 364 Write 282 Mixed 197 SusWrite 273 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 14.8 62% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 63.7 80% 141 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 75%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 7GB free Firmware: 1012 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 294 Write 297 Mixed 200 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 12.1 50% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 82 DQ Write 75.8 DQ Mixed 26.7 34% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 83%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1GB free, PID a83a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 119 Write 30.5 Mixed 1.8 44% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 28% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 35%
SDXC Card 253GB 0GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 17 17 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.7% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 3.3 Mixed 9 SusWrite 14.2 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.7 189% 3.1 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.2% Above average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 14.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NC-R7-371T-52JR Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer NC-R7-371T-52JR

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	1x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1x

SSD
RBU-SNS8100S3256GD 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 755 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBHynixBench 60%, 11,918 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16