MSI MS-16F2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT680/GX680/GT683
MotherboardMSI MS-16F2  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 18:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2960XM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 87.1
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 226
20% 171 Pts
64-Core 75.8
5% 75.8 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
MSI(1462 10A2) 1GB
CLim: 708 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 7.35
Parallax 4.78
5% 6.06 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 7.74
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 229 198 228 220 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 327
Write 142
Mixed 161
SusWrite 216
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 15.7
58% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 111
95% 147 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
119GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 58 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 76.3
Write 73.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 57.7
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 830B M2S4G64CB8HB5N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16F2 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16F2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback