Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 09:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 102
57% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 363
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 100
54% 82 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 98.5
75% 90.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 39 39 53 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.1% Poor
Read 278
Write 119
Mixed 82
SusWrite 44
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8.7
26% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 13.6
13% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
537GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 76 68 103 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 134
Write 117
Mixed 65
SusWrite 86.9
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 40 40 53 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 168
Write 149
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 44.9
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback