ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 0568A42

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 0568A42 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	37.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '16 at 22:56
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 195 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 492 52% 416 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 2,842 User benchmarks, average bench 9% EVGA(3842 1285) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4196 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 10.1 Parallax 6.41 11% 10.2 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 7.17 8% 9.44 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231600 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 5918 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1326 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 195 (A9) Unknown 100 100 437 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65 (AE) Unknown 100 100 161 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 52 223339610152 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 528 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 17014 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5710 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4176 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	71.9% Very good	Read 414 Write 315 Mixed 371 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 22.2 86% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 49.8 84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 100%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1G02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3532 (03) Spinup time 235 227 10241 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4447 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11963 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 603 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 72 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 130 130 210296 (C2) HDA temperature 121 96 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 174 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 172 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 195 195 1158	45.6% Average	Read 60.4 Write 98 Mixed 103 66% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.38 114% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 194 194 2016 (03) Spinup time 186 163 5691 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8167 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17291 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 130 130 210415 (C2) HDA temperature 118 103 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 196 196 1408 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 196 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 143 95 15292	64.9% Good	Read 125 Write 101 Mixed 106 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.22 89% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 67%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 453GB free Firmware: GH2ZB550 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 227 227 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 256 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 769 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 252 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 452132899 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 22428 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 201864118301 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0
Poor: 26% Great: 72%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 276GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 145 143 3750 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 839 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4376 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 764 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 803 (C2) HDA temperature 108 100 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.1% Good	Read 105 Write 104 Mixed 98.8 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.43 115% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT325R7CFR8A HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT325R7CFR8A HMT325R7CFR8A HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT325R7CFR8A Sem... 40GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 30.6 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback