Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 02:14
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 609
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 8495) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 78
50% 66.4 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 46.3
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-CE256 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TC87903
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3252
Write 40.2
Mixed 79
234% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 427
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 5.3
656% 145 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 96%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
170GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 60.5
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba-0098 ACR256X64D3U1333C9-000B M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG-000B M2Y2G64CB8HA5N-CG ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 7.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback