Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55-US3L  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 15:59
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 141
56% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 191
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 1.81
4% 4.88 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 5.39
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 102 124 128 121 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 155
Write 135
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 109
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
71GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 82 68 90 105 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 79.2
Write 76.7
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 90.2
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 1TB
909GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 28.1
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 27
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55-US3L Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback