MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 17:26
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 681
71% 569 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 60.2
52% 63.5 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 54
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 340
Mixed 348
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 15.1
64% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 18.2
66% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
13GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 116 127 123 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 382
Write 141
Mixed 187
SusWrite 122
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 19.6
67% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 94.8
88% 139 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
92GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 57.4
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 71.3
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
289GB free
Firmware: 3.AF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 52.3
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 51.2
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 22.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 3,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback