Acer Predator G9-592

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G9-592 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Mustang_SLS
Memory	17 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160301
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '19 at 00:27
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 51.1 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 150 53% 94.4 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 392 43% 340 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 107E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4691 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.31% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 45 Parallax 2.31 3% 17 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 5.96 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.31% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 17,176 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 261 264 395 216 348 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 806 Write 479 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 322 92% 419 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 18.2 62% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 47.6 87% 171 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 372%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 928GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 125 120 123 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 132 Write 127 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 122 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GB 5,073 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 8.1 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G9-592 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-592

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	40x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	12x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	21x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	20x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	9x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	8x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	6x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	3x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	25x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	9x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16