Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180102
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 15:35
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 647
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 38.2
0% 23.7 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 35.2
27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
180GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 68 75 77 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 77.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 70.4
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 61 65 62 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 96.8
Write 75.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 67.5
47% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
129GB free
Firmware: AM0P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 36.5
Write 95
Mixed 32
SusWrite 76.7
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 Adata 12GB
2134, 2134 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback