MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B38
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 00:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 217
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 778
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1440 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 83.5
53% 73.4 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 57.6
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 111 44 111 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 475
Write 248
Mixed 180
SusWrite 108
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1
6% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 90%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
82GB free
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 459 456 462 458 447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 465
Mixed 420
SusWrite 459
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.2
177% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 231
175% 231 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 111%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 36.2
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback