Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 382
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 0561) 2GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 32.4
21% 29.2 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 31.9
24% 28.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c19 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1095 1152 1163 1180 604 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,977
Write 1,134
Mixed 877
SusWrite 915
272% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 49.7
179% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 466
361% 483 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 212%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IR2133D464L15S/4G IR2400D464L15S/4G 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 29.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback