Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0YJPT1
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 18:19
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 500
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.7% Very good
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 107
Parallax 100
78% 101 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 91
76% 93.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 346 423 433 435 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 470
Write 432
Mixed 378
SusWrite 392
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 31.7
103% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 291
212% 275 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 127%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 102
Write 97
Mixed 65
SusWrite 61.3
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 76%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
863GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 93 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 50.2
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 92.3
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
181% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA600 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 105 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 158
Write 157
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 106
161% 123 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
162% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 80%
WD My Passport 260D 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 111 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 114
Write 103
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 113
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
202% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 64%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 105 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 161
Write 162
Mixed 127
SusWrite 106
185% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback