HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80A9
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 16:56
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 88
2-Core 174
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 521
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80A9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4821
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 16
Parallax 3.41
3% 7.63 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3
Splatting 0.13
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 290 286 288 291 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 485
Write 221
Mixed 355
SusWrite 278
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 32.1
126% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 176
161% 251 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
115GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 22 25 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 118
Write 38
Mixed 21
SusWrite 23.3
53% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Notebook Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback