Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X99  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 14:56
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 718
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.3% Poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 54.9
10% 42.9 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 55.2
Splatting 49.4
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,714
Write 3,361
Mixed 3,815
880% 3,964 MB/s
4K Read 280
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 83.4
569% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 284
233% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Marvell Raid VD 0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 107 109 106 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.12% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 59.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 106
12% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 2.6
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 5.1
5% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 142%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
200GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 247 247 248 248 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 425
Write 248
Mixed 172
SusWrite 247
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 21.8
90% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 57.4
102% 205 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 85%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 343 344 346 337 339 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 286
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 334
194% 269 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.9
406% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 203%
Great: 134%
Marvell Raid VD 0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 152 153 150 138 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 115
Write 83
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 146
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 157%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 105
Mixed 46
72% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 112
Mixed 46
74% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 33.6
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $620
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback