Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '16 at 06:52
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 603
66% 520 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 2956) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 26.3
31% 32.7 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 36
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 393
Mixed 410
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 43.3
172% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 115
100% 141 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 128
Write 133
Mixed 127
98% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.22
102% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75%
Great: 84%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
43GB free
Firmware: 0304
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 35.4
Write 41.7
Mixed 38.2
29% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.26
79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A 500GB
295GB free, PID 6208
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 30.9
Mixed 8.12
29% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.25
30% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback