Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '19 at 23:29
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 126 57% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 749 56% 505 Pts	64-Core 1,076 67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FED) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 119 Parallax 125 107% 125 fps	MRender 173 Gravity 111 Splatting 98.2 101% 127 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58 74,184 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 720 552 931 1271 537 459 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,166 Write 1,434 Mixed 1,245 SusWrite 745 311% 1,398 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 71.4 237% 80.6 MB/s	DQ Read 724 DQ Write 722 DQ Mixed 582 476% 676 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 311%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 36.7 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 33.8 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,674x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,311x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,442x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,257x
RTX 3080Nvidia $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,088x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,475x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,849x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $59Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	648x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,018

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16