Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10c 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 63.6 2-Core 96 53% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 120 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 390E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 2.94 2% 2.98 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.61 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AST280 240GB 1,219 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0412A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 343 43 54 40 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 460 Write 324 Mixed 377 SusWrite 144 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 1.3 73% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 1.4 39% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x4GB 11,918 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 15 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.4 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	13x
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	5x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	18x

SSD
IT L8T-128L9G 128GBLiteonBench 75%, 711 samples	5x
MZNTE128HMGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 150 samples	3x
MZNTE256HMHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 67%, 1,123 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16